PLS SHARE MY BLOG ON FORUMS ,FACEBOOK ,TWITTER ..........TO WARN HUMAN TO WARN HUMAN

Author : Huynh Phu Dat
Contributor and Translator : Nguyen Van Duong , my uncle help me a little with English

To build a building on an area which grow grass , bush , tree we have to destroy the plants . After finishing , we never replant the same kind of these destroyed plants .
In reality , the environmental  law , land use policy , LEED standard , construction laws of all the countries on the world never force us to grow these plants again . All the houses , buildings , roads of human got errors of lost ecosystem . Legislators , scientists forget them . We need a global policy for this problem . This is also a chance to make Earth soak more huge CO2 globally .

All US EPA buildings are examples .

 US EPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division , 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 (SESD ) and US EPA Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA . Red area are destroyed ecosystem on the right images and they never replant the same kind these destroyed plants .

You can read their final reports :
http://www.epa.gov/region4/ej/Jacksonville_EJ_FINAL.pdf
http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-5

This is a check list of LEED system . Even you have platinum certificate , we still lost lost ecosystem because no replant lost ecosystem option in this check list .I also checked LEED v4 2014 and found the same problem .

http://www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-building-design-and-construction-current-version-0

GreenEnergy can't soak CO2=>can't soak/decrease CO2 of atmostphere=>can't solve Climate Change .When we use 100% solar energy , CO2 of atmosphere still there , only things can soak CO2 can decrease CO2 of atmosphere =>can solve climatre change  

On average 1 adult tree soak 45 lbs CO2/year . 1990 to 2010, US lost/gain an average 384,350 ha forest/year or 0.13% forest area( total 2.6 % from 1990 to 2010 ) . A rate : deforesting 384,350 ha adult trees which soak 45 lbs CO2/tree/year ( will soak 45lbsCO2/year/tree if we don't exploit them) reforesting 384,350 ha young trees - which can't soak 45 lbs CO2/tree/year in all 17 years , until them become adult trees , the weakness of US deforestation/reforestation . We have conservation of forest ha but do we have conservation of CO2 absorption ability of 7,687,000 ha exploited adult trees , when 7,687,000 ha reforested trees are young trees ?

I contact USDA Northern Research Station , they agreed with me about the issue but can't do anything because forest policy were passed by US Congress ( I will forward the conversation to you if I have your email) . I posted question about the issue to EPA Public Access but they don't reply even a word . Time to find a great supporter .

A young tree at 1 year absorb 2.5 lbs Co2 , 2 year absorb 5 lbs Co2 , 3 year absorb 7.5 lbs Co2 , 4 year absorb 10 lbs Co2 ,  5 year absorb 12.5 lbs Co2 ,  6 year absorb 15 lbs Co2 , 7 year absorb 17.5 lbs Co2 , 8 year absorb 20 lbs Co2 , 9 year absorb 22.5 lbs Co2 , 10 year absorb 25 lbs Co2 , 11 year absorb 27.5 lbs Co2 , 12 year absorb 30 lbs Co2 , 13 year absorb 32.5 lbs Co2 , 14 year absorb 35 lbs Co2 , 14 year absorb 37.5 lbs Co2 , 15 year absorb 40 lbs Co2 , 16 year absorb 42.5 lbs Co2 , 17 year absorb 45 lbs Co2 => in 18 year 1 tree absorb : 2.5 + 5 +7.5 + 10 + 12.5 + 15 + 17.5 + 20 + 22.5 +25 +27.5 + 30 + 32.5 + 35 + 37.5 + 40 + 42.5 + 45 = 435 lbs .

But old environment with adult trees only , all every year tree soak 45 lbs CO2/tree , right ? In 18 years if we don't exploit the tree , each tree absorb : 45 * 18 years = 810 lbs CO2 , not 435 lbs CO2 .

So fix this error globally is a chance to make the Earth soak , store more CO2 , a golden chance to make absorbing CO2 > emitting CO2 , after absorb all CO2 at Earth , it begin to soak CO2 of atmosphere . The key is here . Policymaker need to know this problem .

Some examples :

We have to increase CO2 sequestration of plants bigger than CO2 emission of our country , the correct way to solve CO2 emission of our country . We at least must plant enough plants which soak CO2 equal with old adult destroyed plant first , than increase  CO2 sequestration of plants until it bigger than CO2 emission of our country

Summary

Laws system =  green standard , environmental laws , land use policies , constructions laws , LEED ratings system and every kind of green standards
When we build a house , our house destroy 1 tree to build , after we build house , laws system never force us plant 1 tree because our house destroy 1 tree . Restore environment : plant 1 tree . Before you build a house , Earth has 1 tree , absorb 45 lbs CO2 , after finish the house , Earth lost 1 tree which absorb 45 lb CO2 . We don’t have absorb CO2 rules of environment before/after we build constructions . All laws systems of the world got these mistakes .


US EPA Region 4 . Google Earth ,  left 1993 right 2012 . To build this building , they destroy some trees , after they build it , they don’t restore environment : plant some trees
Report of US EPA : http://www.epa.gov/region4/ej/Jacksonville_EJ_FINAL.pdf
If we look at 1 top view image of a city , that is a set of mistakes , which each ground floor of 1 building , house , supermarket , police station , ......... is 1 mistake of lost ecosystem which have  CO2 sequestration ability . This error type decrease legally CO2 sequestration ability of Earth . Why this happen , because architecture never calculate environmental CO2 sequestration before/after we build a house , building , .... or larger is a town , city . We never calculate plants in a city absorb CO2 equal or not with lost nature ecosystem we destroy to build a city .After we lost ecosystem , building emit CO2 , 2 bad things for 1 mistake .
Atmosphere : A . CO2 of A increase because of emit CO2 at Earth > absorb CO2 . If absorb CO2 > emit CO2 , after finish CO2 at Earth , it begin absorb CO2 of A => CO2 of Earth decrease .
Green standard , environmental laws , land use policies , constructions laws , LEED ratings system and every kind of green standards must have rules of restore CO2 sequestration ability of environment after we build everything .

 We can see this is a check list of LEED standard , no restore lost ecosystem right ?

According to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

In US , we have
Housing units 2013 : 132,802,859 .
So 132,802,859 unit if 30% are house contain ground floor , so just like EPA buildings above , US give their children a society contain more than 40000000 errors of design . I'm helpless , hopeless now with this project .I need a help of a environmental scientist .

Climate Change and Global Serious Errors of Whole World's Design

Climate Change and Global Serious errors of Design

Abstract : Do we protect environment good or not ? Example we design our city with 90% area is plants and 10% area is buildings . Is it correct 100% ?No , it’s not correct . Example before we build constructions , the area which wild plants , trees absorb 1 million lbs CO2 , and then we build some buildings , the area which trees , grassland only absorb 900 000 lbs CO2 . So we damage environment , we lost 100 000 lbs CO2 should absorbed by trees , plants , right ? And our environmental law allow that , or legislator , environmental scientists absolutely don’t have knowledge about conservation of absorbing CO2 , creating O2 , absorb water in urban design , ……. And in Climate Change , it’s really not good , when environment which we restore absorb less CO2 than environment of the past , right ? Scientist need to know about this problem . Do we build our cities , towns without comparing value of absorbing CO2 , before and after we build city , town …. 100% around the world ? Yes . Is that a global serious errors of design , yes . All the scientific forum I posted my topic , they're all biology expert , physics expert , ...... but all of them almost silent when read my topic, no one can confirm I was wrong .


I will analyze 1 best building and it’s environment before and after they build the building : NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction , this building finish in 2009 with 50 acres – section and 26 acres for grassland .

 Google Earth image .
This is image of NOAA . Above are original place of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction , before US build NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction, College Park, Maryland and after they build the building . Sadly , the architecture don’t know about the original O2/CO2 come from this area .

3 buildings , only 1 have a chance to restore the original environment but the architecture don’t take this opportunity for a better environment , they use this for worse environment . This things is a serious errors all around this world when they choose grassland .
NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction have 800 employees include staff work inside the building .“ More than 50 percent of the roof surface covered with plants, including chive, sedum, and flowers for better insulation and protection “ ( Credit : NOAA )

I use Google Earth for measuring and I have 26 acres of grassland so I only analyze the 26 acres section to find out did US government protect the environment or not

The original place ( A + B + C = 26 acres ) before US government build are 26 acres of trees and wild grass area. With black white image , I estimate 1 acre of tree have 300 mature trees and 2/3 area for grass .

"A single mature tree can absorb carbon dioxide at a rate of 48 lbs per year- McAliney, Mike. Arguments for Land Conservation: Documentation and Information Sources for Land Resources Protection, Trust for Public Land, Sacramento, CA, December, 1993

On average, one tree produces nearly 260 pounds of oxygen each year. Two mature trees can provide enough oxygen for a family of four. Environment Canada, Canada's national environmental agency

So 26 acres( A + B + C = 26 acres ) of trees with 300 trees per acre = 26 * 300 = 7800 trees .

In 1 year , 26 acres of trees absorb : 7800 *48 = 374400 lbs CO2 .
In 1 year , 26 acres of tree produce : 7800 * 260 = 2028000 lbs O2 .

In 1 year , 26 acres of trees absorb : 7800 *48 = 374400 lbs CO2 .
In 1 year , 26 acres of tree produce : 7800 * 260 = 2028000 lbs O2 .

Mature grasslands sequester 2400 - 3600 lbsCO2 per acre each year – Technical Assessment of the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Managed Turfgrass in the United State ,Dr . RanajitSahu , 2008 at the request of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute .

It is estimated that a 50 by 50 foot lawn (2,500 square feet), releases enough oxygen for a family of four, while absorbing carbon dioxide, hydrogen fluoride and perosyacetyle nitrate This means that one square foot of grass will produce approximately half a kilogram of oxygen a day .

Because wild grass / native plants usually grow under the trees so I estimate 2/3 of 260acres are wild grass / native plants .2/3 of 26 acres are wild grass / native plants . It’s meant about 17 acres are wild grass / native plants . 1 acre = 43560 square feet . I will choose lowest CO2 value for wild grass and native plants : 2400 lbs CO2 per acre per year .

In 1 year , 17 acres of wild grass / native plants absorb : 2400 * 17 = 40800 lbs CO2 .
In 1 year , 17 acres of wild grass / native plants produce : 43560 * 0.5 * 17 * 365 = 135144900 kg O2 .
1 kg = 2.2 lbs so 135144900 kg = 135144900 * 2.2 = 297318780 lbs O2 .

The original O2 value of 26 acres before US build NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction are :2028000 + 297318780 =299346780 lbs O2 for creating O2 per year .
The original CO2 value of 26 acres before Us build NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction are :374400 + 40800 = 415200 lbs CO2 for absorbing CO2 per year .

After US build NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction , they choose grassland in front of the building :
If US use best grass type and I choose highest CO2 value according Dr .RanajitSahu : 3600 CO2 lbs per year so the value of CO2 of 26 acres of grassland can absorb of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction :

26 * 3600 = 93600 lbs CO2 per year .
And the value O2 of 26 acres of grassland :43560 * 0.5 * 365 * 26 = 206692200 kg O2 .
1 kg = 2.2 lbs so 206692200 * 2.2 = 454722840 lbs O2 .

NASA assumes each person needs 1.9 pounds of oxygen per day , I choose 2 lbs O2 for short . Employees in US work 5 days per week and 12 days for annual leave ( Wiki ) .1 year = 52 weeks = 365 days
So total day 800 employee work at NOAA per year is : 365 – ( 52 * 2 ) – 12 = 249 days
800 employees work 249 days and each employee work 8 hours per day so they need : ( 800 * 2 lbs O2 )* 249 = ( 800* 2 ) * 249 / 3 = 398400 lbs O2 / 3 =132800 lbs per year .

According to Wiki , 1 person emit approximately 2.3 CO2 lbs per day per person so value of CO2 800 employee of NOAA work 249 days and each employee work 8 hours per day is : ( 2.3 * 800 ) * 249 / 3 = 152720 lbs per year .

A car emit about 8.2 kg CO2 per one gallon of gasoline. A car in US emit average 16,940 pounds CO2 per year. 800 employees work 249 days in NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction .If 800 employees use cars so the CO2 pollution value of NOAA’s employees when they use car to go to work is :
( 16940 / 365 * 249 ) * 800 = 9245063 lbs CCO2 per year .
9245063 lbs CO2 is a estimate CO2 value when 800 employees of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction go to work by cars .
According to http://jg2090.newsvine.com/_news/2009/09...0-pounds-of-co2

A gallon of gasoline weighs 6.3 pounds and is comprised of 87% Carbon (C) and 13% HydrogenA CO2 molecule has one carbon atom (atomic weight 12) and two oxygen atoms (atomic weight of 16 each). A carbon atom has a weight of 12, and each oxygen atom has a weight of 16, giving each single molecule of CO2 an atomic weight of 44 (12 from carbon and 32 from oxygen).

Therefore, to calculate the amount of CO2 produced from a gallon of gasoline, the weight of the carbon in the gasoline is multiplied by 44/12 or 3.7.
Since gasoline is about 87% carbon and 13% hydrogen by weight, the carbon in a gallon of gasoline weighs 5.5 pounds (6.3 lbs. x .87).

We can then multiply the weight of the carbon (5.5 pounds) by 3.7, which equals 20 pounds of CO2.
A H2O molecule has two Hydrogen atoms (atomic weight 1) and one oxygen atom (atomic weight of 16 each). Each Hydrogen atom has a weight of 1, and the oxygen atom has a weight of 16, giving each single molecule of H20 an atomic weight of 18 (2 from Hydrogen and 16 from oxygen).
Therefore, to calculate the amount of H2O produced from a gallon of gasoline, the weight of the Hydrogen in the gasoline is multiplied by 18/2 or 9.

Since gasoline is about 87% carbon and 13% hydrogen by weight, the Hydrogen in a gallon of gasoline weighs 0.8 pounds (6.3 lbs. x .13). We can then multiply the weight of the Hydrogen (0.8 pounds) by 9, which equals 7 pounds of H2O or water and water vapor.
How is 21 pounds of Oxygen removed from the atmosphere?:
The combined total weight of the CO2 and the H2O produced by the burning of one gallon of gasoline is 27 pounds. Since we started with one gallon of gas that weighed 6.3 pounds, the amount of Oxygen converted to H2O or CO2 by burning the gasoline is (27-6.3) or 21.7 pounds.
This 21 pounds of breathable Oxygen was removed from the atmosphere by passing through your car's air filter, through the engine, and out the tailpipe as H2O and CO2.

So each 20 lbs CO2 we need 21.7 lbs O2 . 9245063 lbs CO2 is a estimate CO2 value when 800 employees of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction go to work by cars so the value of O2 we need is : 9707316 lbs O2 .
So this is the total info :

 According to Wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_building

Reducing environmental impact : Green building practices aim to reduce the environmental impact of building. The first rule is that the greenest building is the building that doesn't get built. Since construction almost always degrades a building site, not building at all is preferable to green building, in terms of reducing environmental impact. The second rule is that every building should be as small as possible. The third rule is not to contribute to sprawl, even if the most energy-efficient, environmentally sound methods are used in design and construction. Urban infill sites are preferable to suburban "greenfield" sites .

The green building standard and our green standard have a serious mistake about conservation of CO2 , O2 because before people build the building , the area for a building usually have plants , trees , bush trees , wild grass , ….
After we build the building , plants , trees , bush trees , wild grass , …. ( which absorb CO2 , water , create O2 ) replace by building ( which doesn’t absorb CO2 , water , create O2 ) . After we build the building , compare between the past and the present , the area of the building lost a value of absorbing CO2 , water and creating O2 . According to conservation of CO2 , O2 , water of the past , for the conservation of the Earth at the present , we must find another area doesn’t have plants , than plant trees or any kind of plants to restore the absorbing CO2 and creating O2 ( in replace for plants of the past of building’s area ) value for the present .

Green building standard are followed by 19 countries around this world don’t force the owners of buildings
re – create the environment of the past to re – archive absorbing CO2 value and creating O2 value after they build the building .

All other protecting environmental definition , law systems don’t talk about conservation of absorbing CO2 , creating O2 :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_architecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_design
http://green.wikia.com/wiki/LEED_Certification
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design

International Environmental Law : https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=132294
United States Environmental Protection : http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations

Australia: Nabers / Green Star / BASIX (in NSW only) , Brazil: AQUA / LEED Brasil , Canada: LEED Canada / Green Globes / Built Green Canada , China: GBAS , Finland: PromisE France: HQE
Germany: DGNB / CEPHEUS , Hong Kong: BEAM Plus , India: Indian Green Building Council (IGBC)/ GBCIndia (Green Building Construction India)/ GRIHA , Indonesia: Green Building Council Indonesia (GBCI) / Greenship , Italy: Protocollo Itaca / Green Building Council Italia , Japan: CASBEE , Jordan: Jordan Green Building Council , Korea, Republic of: Green Building Certification Criteria / Korea Green Building Council , Malaysia: GBI Malaysia , Mexico: LEED Mexico , Netherlands: BREEAM Netherlands , New Zealand: Green Star NZ , Pakistan: Pakistan Green Building Council , Philippines: BERDE / Philippine Green Building Council , Portugal: Lider A / SBToolPT® , Qatar: Qatar Sustainability Assessment System (QSAS) , Republic of China (Taiwan): Green Building Label , Singapore: Green Mark , South Africa: Green Star SA , Spain: VERDE , Switzerland: Minergie , United States: LEED / Living Building Challenge / Green Globes / Build it Green / NAHB NGBS / International Green Construction Code (IGCC) / ENERGY STAR
United Kingdom: BREEAM , United Arab Emirates: Estidama , Turkey : CEDBİK
Thailand : TREES , Vietnam: LOTUS Rating Tools , Czech Republic: SBToolCZ

The protecting environmental laws system , green standard help to decrease absorbing CO2 value and decrease creating O2 value of the Earth today .
Our Earth have Global Serious Errors of Design .

This is Google Earth image of United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division , 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 (SESD ).
Left picture use Google data , date 1993 . Right picture , date 2012

Total facility area : 66,201 gross square feet ( GSF ) . To build United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division need 66,201 gross square feet of forest .I use Google and with dense density of forest here , I estimate 1 acre tree here have 300 trees per acre . 1 acre = 43560 square feet . So 66201 gross square feet / 43560 = 1.5 so in the past here we had : 300* 1.5 = 450 trees .

"A single mature tree can absorb carbon dioxide at a rate of 48 lbs per year- McAliney, Mike. Arguments for Land Conservation: Documentation and Information Sources for Land Resources Protection, Trust for Public Land, Sacramento, CA, December, 1993

On average, one tree produces nearly 260 pounds of oxygen each year. Two mature trees can provide enough oxygen for a family of four. Environment Canada, Canada's national environmental agency

So in 1 year 450 trees of 66,201 gross square feet can absorb CO2 : 48 * 450 = 21600 lbs CO2 .
In 1 year 450 trees here create O2 : 260 * 450 = 117000 lbs O2 .

According to United States Environmental Protection Agency ‘s website ,
http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/sesd.html
http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/about.html
http://www.epa.gov/oaintrnt/facilities/athens-sesd.htm

And 2011 report of US EPA : http://www.epa.gov/region4/ej/Jacksonville_EJ_FINAL.pdf

United States Environmental Protection Agency doesn’t have a plan to re - plant 450 trees for overcome the environmental damage here in Climate Change . If we think about conservation of absorbing CO2 , and creating O2 , Earth today lost : 21600 lbs CO2 of absorbing and 117000 lbs of creating in Climate Change age , when we really need to increase absorbing CO2 of plants . Or Earth today absorb CO2 smaller than Earth of the past 21600 lbs CO2 and creating O2 smaller Earth of the past 117000 lbs CO2


because of United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division , 980 College Station Road Athens, Georgia 30605-2720 (SESD ).

This is a parking area at United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA .
Date of left picture is 1994 , right is 2014
I use Google Earth measure the areaand have a result : 108900 gross square feet . To increase the size of parking area , US destroy a 108900 square feet of forest . Forest here has a dense density so I choose 1 acre have 300 trees so 108900 square feet have : 108900 / 43560 = 2.5 so total trees here in 1994 is 750 trees .

So in 1 year 750 trees 108900 square feetcan absorb CO2 : 48 * 750 = 36000 lbs CO2 .
In 1 year 450 trees here create O2 : 260 * 750 = 195000 lbs O2 .


According to United States Environmental Protection Agency’s website :
http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-5

US EPA Region 5 , Cleveland Office don’t have a plan to re – create 750 trees after they destroy environment of this area to build the parking area . So about conservation of CO2 and O2 , the 2014 Earth absorb CO2 less than the Earth 1994 36000 lbs CO2 and the 2014 Earth create O2 less than the Earth 1994 195000 lbs O2 because of parking area at United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA . Because I only can choose what Google Earth have and the historical image of Google Earth only can move to the past 1994 , if I can move farer , I can prove the whole truth United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 , Cleveland Office , 25089 Center Ridge Road Westlake , OH 44145 – 4170 , USA


Green building – LEED green standard are followed by Argentina Green Building Council , Green Building Council of Australia , Green Building Council Brasil , Peru Green Building Council , Canada Green Building Council Dutch Green Building Council , Emirates Green Building Council , France Green Building Council , German Sustainable Building Council , Indian Green Building Council Italy Green Building Council , Japan Green Building Consortium , Korea Green Building Council , Mexico Green Building Council New Zealand Green Building Council , Green Building Council of South Africa ,Sweden Green Building Council , Taiwan Green Building Council , Romania Green Building Council , United Kingdom Green Building , Council U.S. Green Building Council Vietnam Green Building Council and World Green Building Council , all are correct if we focus on conservation all environmental index ? Because all Climate summit focus on how can we decrease high CO2 level of atmosphere so on this article , we only analyzing absorbing CO2 value , creating O2 value of the environment of the past and the present of some buildings . I will analyze this green standard is good or not .


According to Wikipedia and US Green Building Council :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership_in_Energy_and_Environmental_Design
http://www.usgbc.org/articles/qa-univers...ion-green-build

I will analyze University of Texas at Dallas , first academic building in Texas to receive LEED Platinum status. This is the area of University of Texas at Dallas :

I use Google Earth , date of image on the left : 2001 , date on the right : 2013 .

The wild grass area = 14.6 acres .

Mature grasslands sequester 2400 - 3600 lbsCO2 per acre each year – Technical Assessment of the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Managed Turfgrass in the United State ,Dr . RanajitSahu , 2008 at the request of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute .

It is estimated that a 50 by 50 foot lawn (2,500 square feet), releases enough oxygen for a family of four, while absorbing carbon dioxide, hydrogen fluoride and perosyacetyle nitrate This means that one square foot of grass will produce approximately half a kilogram of oxygen a day .

I choose this type of grassland absorb lowest CO2 value : 2400 lbs CO2 per year . Because wild grass doesn’t cover 100 % percent of this area and I estimate 50 % percent of this area in 2001 cover by wild grass so

In 1 year 14.6 acres with 50% cover by wild grass absorb : 14.6 * 2400 * 50% = 17520 lbs CO2 per year .
In 1 year 14.6 acres with 50% cover by wild grass create : 43560 * 0.5 * 14.6 * 365 * 50% = 58152712 kg O2 .
1 kg = 2.2 lbs so 58152712 kg O2 * 2.2 = 127935966.4 lbs O2 .

University of Texas at Dallas doesn’t have a plan to re –create palnts can absorb 17520 lbs CO2 and create 58152712 lbs O2 . Because of University of Texas at Dallas - LEED Platinum certificate , Earth today lost 17520 lbs of absorbing CO2 , 58152712 lbs O2 of creating O2 .
We build a lot of roads . And a road go through a wild grass area , bush trees , a forests , …. Roads decrease of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value of wild grass area , forest , …… of all countries . And all countries don’t have conservative rule to re – create plants in replace for all plants area turn into roads area .
Have you ever see airport ? A really large area without plants . If we destroy all plants for airport’s area to build airport . We should find a empty place , and plant any kind plants , to make it replace absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 value = value of absorbing CO2 , water , creating O2 of the airport’s environment ( plants) in the past .
Even your city , town design with 70 % for plants and 30 % for building , house , it's not correct because conservation of CO2 , O2 , water need more 30 % of plants and this area of plants must absorb CO2 , water , create O2 value at least equal with absorb CO2 , water , create O2 value of 30 % of the past .
Before I write this article , none of any architecture know about conservation of CO2 , O2 even they design our city , town , ……. world thousand years ago . So the design problems of conservation of CO2 , O appear some thousand years ago .


Extra :

The CO2 of atmosphere is increasing because of emitting CO2 value of cars , bus , human , …. Bigger than absorbing CO2 value of plants , lands , ocean , …….

Compare time :

Decreasing CO2 solution until this solution can absorb CO2 of atmosphere : Only Red go down .

 Decreasing CO2 and increasing CO2 absorbing at the same time make the absorbing CO2 of atmosphere Process begin faster .

Time to talk about money .

About University of Texas at Dallas , first academic building in Texas to receive LEED Platinum status. This is the area of

University of Texas at Dallas :
The wild grass area = 14.6 acres can absorb 58152712 kg CO2 * 2.2 = 127935966.4 lbs O2 .
1 tree absorb average 45 lbs CO2 per year so to restore the environment , we need : : 127935966 / 45 = 2843021 trees . To much trees , right ?
But according to http://www.everything71.com/2012/02/10-type-of-trees-most-carbon-dioxide.html
10 type of trees :
1. Trembesi (Samanea saman) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 28.488,39 kg/year.
2. Bamboo (Bambuseae) : Carbon dioxide that absorbed by bamboo still do not know for sure, but it is estimated 14 tons/year.
3. Cassia (Cassia sp) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 5.295,47 kg/year.
4. Cananga/Kenanga (Canangium odoratum) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 756,59 kg/year.
5. Pingku (Dysoxylum excelsum) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 720,49 kg/year.
6. Banyan/Beringin (Ficus benyamina) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 535,90 kg/year.
7. Krey Payung (Fellicium decipiens) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 404,83 kg/year.
8. Matoa (Pometia pinnata) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 329,76 kg/year.
9. Mahogany (Swettiana mahagoni) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 295,73 kg/year.
10. Saga (Adenanthera pavonina) : Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 221,18 kg/year.

Trembesi Wiki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albizia_saman

If University of Texas want to restore the environment and we use Trembesi to absorb CO2 : 58152712 kg CO2 / 28488 = 2042 Trembesi trees .

University of Texas at Dallas : http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2011/9/20-1...us_article.html

If plant 1 trees need 5 USD so plant 2042 trees need 5 * 2042 = 10210 USD . UTD has 19000 students , if all student and all emplyees of UTD donate 1 USD per , we can have 4084 Trembesi trees easily . And every year , all people donate 1 USD is enough to take care 4084 Trembesi trees ( We make a better environment when we make environment absorb more CO2 than the past , perhaps )

NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction : Absorb 415200 lbs CO2 = 188727 lbs CO2 .

We use Trembesi : 188727 lbs CO2 / 28488 lbs CO2 = 6 trees
NOAA CWCP have 800 employees so all 800 employees of NOAA CWCP should plant 800 trees for a better environment .

Most of global carbon cycle images I found on internet , the info are the same :

 All of the images conbine all factors , natural CO2 emitter / absorption and human’s CO2 .
In my opinion , there is a another way to explain , make everything become easier to understand :

Because land , sea , .... and our plants right now can not store more CO2 , this thing make CO2 of atmostphere increase to high level , so here I split the CO2 cycle image into 3 images , 1st image is natural CO2 cycle but with out human’s factory , cars , burning fossil fuel . There is a surcharge of absorbing CO2 .

Here , I delete " burning fossil " in this image

Add ,  +

Add , +

1 family can cost 15 USD or 20 USD if 1 trembesi is 5 USD . If they want more , they can plant some Chirstmas trees , 3 or 4 trees to absorb methane . I “ Google” 2 weeks but no data for me to calculate how much methane 1 Christmas tree absorb .
Trembesi have many names ( And I hope I’m not wrong with this info ) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albizia_saman

http://www.ask.com/question/golden-rain-tree
The Golden Rain Tree original comes from eastern Asia. It is also known as the Pride in India, China Tree, and Varnish Tree. It is considered a small to medium deciduous type tree. It can grow from 23 feet inches tall up to 40 inches tall. It has long leaves that are six to sixteen inches long. It also has yellow flowers in the summertime. In the United States, it is a favorite tree among many growers because it can withstand many conditions including poor soil types, air pollution, and drought conditions. It can grow in the United States in zones 5 through 9.
How to Sprout Monkey Pod Rain Tree Seeds | Garden Guides http://www.gardenguides.com/92487-sprout-monkey-pod-rain-tree-seeds.html#ixzz2w7QvT4AU
The monkey pod tree is a tropical member of the legume family. The tree is memorable for its huge, domed canopy and massive, gnarled roots. Growing to a height of 80 feet, the monkey pod is native to South America and grows in many tropical regions of the world. If you plan on growing a monkey pod tree, realize that this tree will get very large and it grows quite fast, from 2 1/2 to 5 feet per year, according to botanists at Bishop Museum in Honolulu. Very heat- and sunlight-dependent, the monkey pod tree is hardy in USDA zones 9 to 11.

The problem in US or any country is do they have any areas can plant trembesi or not ? And family have their own house , they don’t need to plant trembesi in front of their house , just donate money to a environmental organization so they can plant trembesi at some place

There are about 125000 schools in US . If someone help me with this manuscript , a newspaper publish it . And than a school will plants some trees to restore environment . After they plant trees to restore the environment , they plant 1 more tree : Trembesi (Samanea saman) , Carbon dioxide is absorbed reaches 28.488,39 kg/year.
If 125 000 school do this sample thing , we have :
125 000 * 28.5 = 3562500 tons CO2 is absorbed after 15 years , when trees became mature trees .
But according to :
http://www.ask.com/question/how-many-schools-are-in-the-world
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_schools_are_in_the_world?#slide=3
We have 100 millions school in the world , after they restore the environment of the past by planting some trees , if only 50% school have enough money to plants more trees , 1 more tree for each school :
50 000 000 * 28.5 = 1 425 000 000 tons CO2 per years .
We emit about 29 gigatons CO2 per years .
According to http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_skyscrapers_are_there_in_the_world?#slide=3
There are 85767 skycrappers in the world :
http://www.ask.com/question/how-many-hospitals-worldwide
If after the owners of skycrappers restore the environment of the past by planting some trees , they have money to plant each skycrapper 1 more tree - trembesi :
85767 * 28.5 = 244359.5 tons CO2 per year .
Than we have many hotels , motel , hospitals , resorts , industrial areas , factories , theatres , police stations , courts , ......... in the world . They can do it .

IF 1 factory emit 365 tons CO2 per year , after they plant some trembesi because of position of the factory , they need more 365 tons CO2 / 28.5 = 13 trees . I think it cost not to much money .
An the most important is our houses . How many house in the world can restore the environment of the past and plant 1 more trembesi for each house ?
Before I post this topic here , I already post this topic on some sciencetific forum , I need to warn people , they need to change environmental law to protect environment :
http://www.climate-debate.com/forum/repo...gy--d6-e283.php
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/81269-climate-change-and-global-serious-errors-of-design/ ,
.........


Why I can explain like that , because I have a formula :

http://www.scienceagogo.com/forum/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=50828&page=1

http://sciencechatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=26468

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/81269-climate-change-and-global-serious-errors-of-design/

 

http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/81269-climate-change-and-global-serious-errors-of-design/

( data is not accurate here , but I must re -post it . Must do it )  
I will calculate the water can absorb by plants between 26 acres original area and 260 acres grassland after they build NOAA . I will choose the wild grass / native plants can absorb half of mas of water the present grass type of NOAA can absorb and in 1 day have 1 time rain .
The average 10,000-square-foot lawn can absorb more than 6,000 gallons of water from a rainfall event, limiting the potential for runoff. (University of Missouri Extension) .

1 acre = 43560 square foot so 26 acres can absorb : ( 43560 / 10000 ) * 26 * 6000 = 4.356 * 26 * 6000 = 679536 gallons water in 1 day have 1 time rain – the is mass of water 26 acres of grassland can absorb in 1 day in front of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction . The building is a candidate for silver certification by the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED™ Green Building Rating System ( Source – NOAA ) .

And original area of 26 acres in front of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction :
Because 17 acres of wild grass and native plant can absorb half of mass of water the present grass type in front of NOAA Center for weather and Climate prediction can absorb so 17 original acres of wild grass and native plant can absorb : ( 43560 / 10000 ) * 17 * 3000 = 4.356 * 17 * 3000 = 222156 gallons water .

According to multi – sources :
American forest organization :http://www.americanforests.org/discover-forests/tree-facts/ .
North Carolina State University : http://www.ncsu.edu/project/treesofstrength/treefact.htm
http://forestry.about.com/od/treephysiology/p/tree_water.htm
http://www.ask.com/answers/49918861/how-much-water-does-a-tree-absorb-in-a-day
http://www.ask.com/question/how-much-water-does-a-tree-absorb-in-a-day
……….
1 tree can absorb 50 – 100 gallons water per day . date of the black and white picture , base on Google Earth – history image are 23rd April 1989 . And I choose 7800 trees here are adult trees , which 1 tree can absorb 100 gallons water per day . So 7800 adult trees of 26 original acres can absorb : 7800 * 100 = 780000 gallons water .

 If 7800 trees are young trees absorb 50 gallons water each tree so total water 7800 trees can absorb : 7800 * 50 = 39000 gallons water . So the total water the original 26 acres of NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction can absorb in 1 day is : 222156 + 390000 = 612156 gallons water if all the trees are young trees . 222156 + 780000 = 1002156 gallons water if all the trees are mature trees . Must analyze 1 time so people know we must analyze water absorb . 

Author : Huynh Phu Dat , Vietnam ID 023750260 . 16 street 49 Tan Tao Ward . Binh Tan District . Ho Chi Minh city . Vietnam